The Supreme Judge sends the UCO to Ferraz to clon the post of Santos Cerdán and authorizes the investigation of his accounts



The Magistrate of the Supreme Court Leopoldo Puente, instructor of the procedure followed against former minister José Luis ábalos, has authorized the Central Operational Unit (UCO) of the civil guard to go to the head office until Thursday’s head office.

In a resolution that is known today, the instructor requires that the PSOE facilitates the UCO agents to enter their headquarters to continue and dig the content of the E -mail account of the business e -mail that Cerdán had in the party.

The cloning of another business account that is only used by Santos Cerdán must also be facilitated by the PSOE.

Bridge, however, He has denied the request of popular accusations, united in the PP, to agree on the import and registration in the PSOE and the place of residence of Cerdán.

It is a dedication that, “limiting rights, is not considered useful at the moment,” the instructor explains.

In his opinion, the risk of destruction of evidence would not be called to remember the interested dedication, which resulted in the extremely predictable, in particular when, as the popular accusation itself suggests, it has had, a few days ago, earlier and filled knowledge of the existence of the research. “

The extensive resolution of the instructor is her response to the UCO report on 5 June, in which serious indications against the former secretary of the organization of the PSOE, which we already weighed at Áballos and its assistant Koldo García, were raised and pointed to the alleged criminal responsibility of various entrepreneurs.

Cerdán accounts

As the UCO has requested, the judge authorizes agents to investigate bills and bank products in which Cerdán appears as holder, authorized or representative, exclusively that associated with the PSOE and the Pablo Iglesias Foundation, as well as real estate or vehicles.

The tax information of the investigated will also be necessary to know the financial situation and its evolution.

Bank account investigation extends to accounts and bank products from five entrepreneurs, who are also cited as investigated, and their companies. The number of bank accounts to be investigated is around 500.

The instructor also requires the Minister of Transport, óscar Puente, to offer UCO agents access and cloning of the content of the business E -mail account for exclusive personal use of former minister ábalos.

The magistrate points out that, in accordance with the UCO report of 5 June, E -Mail said this would have been provided to Koldo García to lead certain relevant communication to the aforementioned telematic direction.

The resolution includes a battery of procedures after the report of 5 June and as soon as Santos Cerdán resigned from the deputy minutes and therefore with his preference.

Firstly, it indicates that your statement will no longer be voluntary, but “mandatory and as investigated (…), will take place afterwards, at the latest on the effect of weighing the approval of precautions of a personal nature.”

Bridge will postpone the date of the statement, as the defense had requested, and points it again on June 30, so that the new lawyer has time to develop his defense effectively.

The judge explains that the competence of the Supreme Court to investigate these facts is based on the Afforeation of ábalos as a substitute, which expands their jurisdiction to all persons who are inaditated to those who are attributed to the former minister.

It is of the opinion that this is the case of Santos Cerdán, who, as the results of the “consistent signs” collected in the UCO report “, could have participated as a consuno with the Afforado, in the Perception of economic awards in exchange for irregular work concessions Public, to the point that this could be, Don Santos Cerdán who will distribute the amounts collected among the various participants. “

Five entrepreneurs investigated

De instructeur heeft tussen 4 en 7 juli aangehaald, in de status van onderzochte onderzochte zakenmensen die de UCO in zijn rapport hebben gewezen: Antonio en Daniel Fernández Menéndez, Fernando Agustín Merino Vera, José Ruz Martínez en Joseba Antxon Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Alonso Egurrola.

They are those who “in their condition, at least, of de facto managers of certain commercial entities, they could have intervened in the incorrect price in favor of these specific public works in exchange for price.”

The judge adds that “in the case of persons who, always in the indications that correspond to the procedural phase in which we are, may have participated in the realization of payments that could have received partly the aforementioned person in this special case in this special case.”

As far as they are concerned, the judge also agrees with the UCO request to require banking information regarding the accounts or products that, in the name of one of the aforementioned investigated or those of the companies, have constructions, LIC, OPP and Servinabar 2000, in the name of this case, in the name of this cause, in the name of this cause, and this in the name of this cause, and this in the name of this cause and this in the name of this cause and this in the name of this cause and this in the name of this cause and this case and and this in the name of this cause of this cause and this case and this cause of this cause of this cause of this cause of this cause of this cause of this case in the name of this case in the name of this cause in the name of this case in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this cause in the name of this Cause, in these benefits, and in the name of this case, and in the preferences of the funeral of the funeral of the funeral.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here