Julián Álvarez’s controversial fine had to be repeated and not canceled

For about three months have passed and the result is immobile, as Enrique Cerezo acknowledges to justify the scarce rebellion before the UEFA that Atlético de Madrid shown in the opinion of most of his followers, but he still collected the most controversial fine in the Derdy of the Derulated of the Derulated of the Derulated of the Derulated of the Derulated The Derulated The Derulated Van de Danulated The Derulated Van de Danulated The Derulated Van de Derulated The Derulated Van de Derulated The Derulated Van de Derulated The Derulated The Derified Of The Derified Of The Derified The Derified Of The Derified Of The Derified Of The Derified The Derieddyd The Derieddyd The Derieddydaerd Van The Dyerdied The Dyerdieddaerd The Dyerdied. Derby of the derby of the derby of the derby of the Derby of the Derby of the Champions. Keep speaking so much that, from next season, a release as Julán Álvarez, who has issued the pass to Real Madrid rooms, must be repeated by double touch, not considered as failed.

This is determined by the Board International (IFAB), an agency responsible for the rules of the game, in the circular that has been sent to all national federations. Norm 14 clarifies, compared to the implementation of penalties, and the injustice in the maximum fine acknowledges the Argentinian striker invalid by stating that the rule was designed for “volunteer” touches. From now on, when the ball enters the goal after a double blow to the unintended leather, the penalty must be repeated, both in the competitions and in the decisive batches. It is clear that if the shot goes out or the goalkeeper stops, there is no second chance for the pitcher.

The IFAB justifies that they are “unusual” and were not specifically regulated actions such as those in the main role Julián, in which the performer touches the ball involuntarily with both feet at the same time, or the leather touches her in the support leg. That is why it considers’ understandable ‘that’ the referees have chosen to punish the pitcher and to give an indirect free kick to the rival or, in the case of the batches, the launch registers as failed.

That said, the IFAB argues that the spirit of the norm is different because it is thought for situations in which the pitcher deliberately plays the ball for the second time before another player touches him, for example after bouncing in the posts or on the crossbar. And it insists that this game is “very different from that of the pitcher that makes double touch when slipping.

In any case, it bases the institution that “it would not be fair not to punish this double touch, because the changed process of the ball can leave the keeper at a disadvantage.” That is why the IFAB finally makes the procedures clear in the following situations: if the pitcher touches the ball involuntarily with both feet at the same time or the ball touches its foot or support leg, the penalty is repeated when the ball enters the goal and, in case not in between, is registered as failure. It will also be determined if the pitcher voluntarily hits the ball with both feet at the same time or it deliberately plays for the second time before another football player hits him.

The IFAB notes that this explanatory procedure will be applied from July 1 of this year, although it can also be used in earlier tournaments such as the Club World Cup that starts on June 14 in the US and where exactly Real Madrid and Atlético represent Spanish football.

The fine in question has not only generated a debate among the leading agencies of football and the arbitration collective, but also keeps Atlético most of his fans, determined to suggest UEFA to understand that it has placed the video of the game in question and sorry to understand, far from the Rej by. Even Atlético did not respond to the bureaux of his clubs in which they claim that the original video of the criminal requirements.

Expert

The International Union of Peñas del Atlético de Madrid published Uninformary expert who demonstrated that the video chaired by the agency by Ceferin to justify the invalidation of the penalty was “edited”. «The analyzed video supplied by UEFA is not an original video obtained from a camera because it is possible to identify: the existence of an inconsistency in metadata; The internal structure does not coincide with recordings of a camera; Certain abnormalities with entropy analysis; Certain changes to the image series; visual clones in specific regions; Total absence of sound content ”, read in the conclusions of the aforementioned report.

The proof of experts was accompanied by a statement in which the International Peñas Union of the Colchonero team has already put on the table that has put the opportunity to even go to ordinary justice. An initiative that has the support of other groups of Rojiblancos fans such as Athletic Senate, Smoke Signs and 50 and that does not have the support of Atlético, perhaps afraid of possible retaliation.